Converging two organizations (or maybe you only want to make them work better together) is not just about scaling technology and building value-added applications together. We need to organize ourselves in a way to deal with diversity without getting stuck in complexity.
Divergence might happen sooner than you think
Anti-Pattern 1: IT/OT Convergence as a top-down decision by management
When we have a desire to converge organizations, we are not engineering a new production line. Quite the contrary, we are now dealing with socio-technical systems where both IT and OT: (1) employ people with specific capabilities, (2) follow their own processes, (3) use (partially shared) technology and infrastructure, (4) have their own goals and (5) share certain cultural assumptions and norms.
Splitting thinking and doing was a way of working from the years when the smart boss told the workers what to do right. However, most management teams today still ‘accidentally’ apply this anti-pattern. They don’t do it consciously because it is so deeply ingrained in how many ‘bosses’ still think and act.
When someone with a typical engineering or operations background gets promoted two things can happen: (1) they apply their old way of thinking onto digital projects (problem!) or (2) they are real leaders, open up to other points of view and create room to experiment, grow and be successful (opportunities ahead!).
Anti-Pattern 2: IT/OT Convergence is about making OT become more like IT (or vice versa)
IT/OT convergence can be misinterpreted as if OT will become more like IT (or vice versa: IT will become more like OT). People who believe this anti-pattern is something to really ‘go for’ will start making claims towards the other: “We know this better because…” or “Our technology is better/more advanced because …”.
This is not going to work, on the contrary, this insinuates that one is better than the other and that will only create resistance, people will start tuning out and eventually will leave your organization.
Side note: If innovation is going to come from anywhere, it is IT. OT is far too little engaged in adapting new ways of working and their scale/talent pool is many orders of magnitude smaller. If you want to know where OT is going in a couple of years, look to IT (but not because IT is “better”).
When claims are being made in one or both directions, friction will lead to mistrust and divergence is waiting around the corner.
